CONSIDER THE PROBE: CXR? WHY BOTHER...POCUS THAT PNA!
(Courtesy Dr. Larissa Unruh)
Now the following topic is extremely close to my heart. Lung US is well studied in both adult and pediatric patients and has excellent test characteristics for the diagnosis of Pneumonia (AND Bronchiolitis!!!).
Dr. Unruh takes us through the following case of a man who clinically had PNA and was actually HYPOXIC, requiring O2. He had a single CXR that was read by the attending radiologist as negative...leaving us with a patient with a new oxygen requirement with a normal CXR.
Thank goodness Dr. Unruh CONSIDERED THE PROBE! She takes us through the following (REAL LIFE) case and some of the basic sonographic findings for PNA. Make sure that you never catch yourself signing a patient out "we ruled out pneumonia with a CXR" (!ESPECIALLY A SINGLE VIEW!). US is more much more sensitive than any single view CXR for detecting a consolidation. Though like all things US, the more places you look, the more sensitive your exam will be...
Enjoy a great case by Dr. Unruh and ALWAYS CONSIDER THE PROBE when evaluating a hypoxemic/dyspneic patient...
CONSIDER THE PROBE: CHOROIDAL WT%?
(Courtesy Dr. Katia Johnston)
Just when you think you finally are getting a solid grip on opthalmalogic (spellcheck?) point-of-care ultrasound findings you have a case like Dr. Katia Johnston recently had, and you begin to question everything. While Retinal Detachments (RD), Posterior Vitreous Detachments (PVD), and Vitreous Hemorrhage (VH) are all quite common findings (in our ED at least), Dr. Johnston picked up on a less common diagnosis based off her abnormal POCUS.
Even if you don't know what you are looking at (which may or may not have been the case for Katia and myself...), it is important to recognize the presence of a clear abnormality. In this case, the POCUS findings led to a same-day diagnosis of a quite rare but vision-threatening diagnosis. Most importantly, the patient ended up with a huge improvement in their outcome based on the early initiation of treatment. Tune in to the following lecture, courtesy of Dr. Johnston and remember always my friends to CONSIDER THE PROBE!
CONSIDER THE PROBE: US FINDINGS IN CRAO
(CREDIT DR. THAKKAR)
While most of us have grown (somewhat) comfortable utilizing POCUS to delineate Retinal Detachments from Vitreous Pathology (detachment vs hemorrhage), who knew that our favorite bedside tool could help point us in the direction of another "can't miss" diagnosis. Dr. Thakkar explains the POCUS findings seen with Central Retinal Arterial Occlusions. Enjoy and remember the next time you are on shift to CONSIDER THE PROBE...
Special thanks to Dr. Pankthi Thakkar.
CONSIDER THE PROBE: DYNAMIC US-GUIDED PARACENTESIS
While Paracentesis is a common enough procedure in the emergency department (for either diagnostic or therapeutic purposes), we must remember that LOW RISK does NOT = NO RISK. In the literature ~ 1 % of paracentesis result in severe hemorrhage requiring transfusion or even operative intervention. There is even risk of death.
While it has become standard of care to utilize static US-guidance to "find the best pocket," remember that you can also consider utilizing real-time US guidance to guide your needle. Dr. Hollingsworth reviews a case where he utilized US-guidance to successfully perform a paracentesis. Resulting in an important diagnosis of first-time spontaneous bacterial peritonitis!
And remember, next time you are on shift to always CONSIDER THE PROBE!
Special thanks to Dr. Allen Hollingsworth.
CONSIDER THE PROBE: INTRO TO REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
During a time where we are becoming more and more cognizant (sp?) of the dangers of chronic opiate use, we should be considering all available tools when addressing our patients' pain. Dr. Joseph Koes presents a series on regional anesthesia including an introduction to regional anesthesia, a review of forearm blocks, and a review of thoracic blocks.
Enjoy the following lecture with much more to come from the good Dr. Koes...
Like what you see? Maybe consider a fourth-year Ultrasound elective...
Special thanks to Dr. Joseph Koes.
CONSIDER THE PROBE: CASE 2
49 y/o M with hx of HTN, HLD, IDDM presents with non-traumatic L-sided painless visual loss. The patient states that several hours prior to presentation he developed blurry vision in his L eye. On quick examination, there are no signs of trauma. Visual acuity is 20/120 on the L and 20/40 on the R with normal intraocular pressures bilaterally. Pupils are briskly reactive without any photophobia or consensual photophobia. The lids, sclera, conjunctivae are grossly normal and there are no corneal defects with fluorescein staining.
Coming out of the room, you are concerned about this sudden-onset blurry vision. You remember a short lecture on visual acuity changes that Dr. Schindlebeck begrudgingly gave you in between his posting about sweater vests on Pinterest. Your differential brings concerning diagnoses including central retinal arterial occlusion (CRAO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), retinal detachment, as well as vitreous hemorrhage. Now, our patient still has some visual acuity in the affected eye which speaks against CRAO (usually profound loss of visual acuity…unable to count fingers, etc.). CRVO is certainly on the differential, but it is usually not a time-sensitive diagnosis to make. That leaves us with retinal detachment vs vitreous hemorrhage. Might be a nice time to CONSIDER THE PROBE!
Lets imagine that your bedside ultrasound of the affected eye had produced the following images/videos:
Take it to the next level:
“Take Home Pearls”
CONSIDER THE PROBE: CASE 1
Case 1: 29 y/o M with hx of asthma, nephrolithiasis presents with R sided flank-pain x 2 days. Pt denies gross hematuria, but describes a colicky pain that radiates to his groin. He is afebrile, but tachycardic and uncomfortable. UA shows 40-50 rbcs/hpf, < 5wbcs/hpf. Pt states that he had a prior kidney stone, but it was on his L side and he had grossly bloody urine at that time. The patient’s abdomen is soft, nontender. CBC shows no leukocytosis, no shift, BMP with normal creatinine. What’s your next move?
Well…if it’s the oral boards, you order weight-based morphine at 0.1mg/kg and shortly afterwards, the patient becomes apneic. In the real world why don’t we give a 1L NS bolus, some Tordol (maybe at the reduced dose of 15mg IV per the recent literature) and then CONSIDER THE PROBE!
While US is poorly sensitive for visualizing stones themselves, it has a relatively high sensitivity for detecting hydronephrosis (up to 98%, Tintanellis and other sources below). Hydronephrosis describes a dilatation of the calyceal system with urine, due to downstream obstruction (stone, or maybe just anatomical). It is categorized as mild-moderate-severe (see Introduction to Bedside US Ch. 6 for definitions of each category, really takes practice by looking at images.)
The degree of hydronephrosis is related proportionally to renal stone size. Just to recall: stone < 5mm passes spontaneously 97%, while stone > 7mm only passes 39% (Gospel of Tintanelli.) Therefore, patients with a typical presentation of nephrolithiasis without moderate-severe hydronephrosis on POCUS have a high likelihood of passing their stone spontaneously and a low likelihood of requiring any surgical intervention. Great news! You may be able to save your patient a CT scan saving them not only radiation but making their ER trip cheaper (good for them) and shorter (good for us).
There is even evidence to support this practice (check out Dr. Bailitz’s article Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography for Suspected Nephrolithiasis in NEJM, we won’t delve into it now, but worthy of a read: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1404446#t=article).
Utilizing the Curvilineal Probe on Renal settings you scan the patient’s R and L kidneys making sure to visualize them completely in both short and long axis. You see these images:
You correctly note only mild hydronephrosis on the right. With a benign abdominal exam and a UA supportive of your diagnosis, you confidently diagnose the patient with R sided nephrolithiasis and write the patient for some analgesics, encourage hydration, consider tamsulosin (a separate evidence-based discussion) and instruct the patient on proper return precautions.
What if our bedside US had showed this image of the R kidney?
You correctly note the “bear-claw” pattern on the R showing moderate to severe hydronephrosis. Correctly recognizing the patient’s higher risk for having either a larger obstructing stone or structural abnormality (malignancy!), you decide to either perform a CT scan at this time or consult directly with Urology.
“Take Home Pearls”
2) POCUS should be your initial imaging study when you are evaluating a patient with a typical presentation of nephrolithiasis. However, in a febrile/septic/toxic appearing patient remember to consider complications such as an infected stone or a renal abscess that may require CT for diagnosis and operative planning.
3)In patients with absent or mild hydronephrosis, consider “treating” the patient for nephrolithiasis without further imaging or consultation. While patients with moderate-severe hydronephrosis, require further imaging (CT) or consultation with Urology, as these patients are likely to require operative intervention.
4)After scanning the kidneys, make sure to check out the aorta, to r/o pathology (AAA, dissection)—especially in older patients with risk factors (smoking, HTN, talk to a fourth year medical student…)
Thanks for reading and always remember when you are on shift to always remember to CONSIDER THE PROBE!