Skip to main content

CONSIDER THE PROBE: CHOROIDAL WT%? (Courtesy Dr. Johnston)

CONSIDER THE PROBE: CHOROIDAL WT%?

(Courtesy Dr. Katia Johnston)

Just when you think you finally are getting a solid grip on opthalmalogic (spellcheck?) point-of-care ultrasound findings you have a case like Dr. Katia Johnston recently had, and you begin to question everything.  While Retinal Detachments (RD), Posterior Vitreous Detachments (PVD), and Vitreous Hemorrhage (VH) are all quite common findings (in our ED at least), Dr. Johnston picked up on a less common diagnosis based off her abnormal POCUS. 

Even if you don't know what you are looking at (which may or may not have been the case for Katia and myself...), it is important to recognize the presence of a clear abnormality.  In this case, the POCUS findings led to a same-day diagnosis of a quite rare but vision-threatening diagnosis.  Most importantly, the patient ended up with a huge improvement in their outcome based on the early initiation of treatment.  Tune in to the following lecture, courtesy of Dr. Johnston and remember always my friends to CONSIDER THE PROBE!




Popular posts from this blog

Weekly Fix - Lung Ultrasound!

Check out the awesome narrated lecture below by EM US Fellow Dr. Damali Nakitende.  Read the Chou article while listening to the podcast .  For more lung US FOAMed fun check out the Thoracic page.

Consider the Probe 3: So I've found the effusion, now what?

A 74 y/o F with pmhx of metastatic breast cancer, IDDM, HTN presents after a syncopal episode.  The patient notes that for the past 2-3 days she has been experiencing some lightheadedness and shortness of breath with exertion.  She is presently undergoing chemotherapy (I'd throw in some random chemo drus here, but lets face it, we wouldn't know them anyways...) and radiation.  She notes that she hasn't been eating/drinking very well.  She denies fever, cough, hemoptysis, leg pain/swelling.  She has mild nausea but no abdominal pain. As you peek up at the monitor, you note that the patient’s HR is ~ 135 and her BP is 88/56 .  Her O2 saturation is  99% and the nurse told you that she was afebrile.  Taking a look at this patient, she looks ill-appearing and anxious.  Her extremities are cool to touch.  You quickly decide that Room 33 might not be the best place to manage this patient and that she would be better served in a RESUS station.  As you wheel the patient to RE

Consider the Probe Take 2: Coming to Grips with your Fundoscopic Shortcomings....

49 y/o M with hx of HTN, HLD, IDDM presents with non-traumatic L-sided painless visual loss.  The patient states that several hours prior to presentation he developed blurry vision in his L eye.  On quick examination, there are no signs of trauma.  Visual acuity is 20/120 on the L and 20/40 on the R with normal intraocular pressures bilaterally.  Pupils are briskly reactive without any photophobia or consensual photophobia.  The lids, sclera, conjunctivae are grossly normal and there are no corneal defects with fluorescein staining.  Coming out of the room, you are concerned about this sudden-onset blurry vision.  You remember a short lecture on visual acuity changes that Dr. Schindlebeck begrudgingly gave you in between his posting about sweater vests on Pinterest.  Your differential brings concerning diagnoses including central retinal arterial occlusion (CRAO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), retinal detachment, as well as vitreous hemorrhage.  Now, our patien